Editorial standards

How Unrot writes, reviews, and corrects content.

Our aim is practical, source-aware guidance with clear limits. We do not turn an informal attention problem into a diagnosis or make a training claim stronger than its evidence.

Who writes and reviews Unrot

Published articles use the shared byline Unrot Editorial Team. It identifies the organization responsible for the work; it is not a claim that every article has been reviewed by a clinician or academic specialist. Unrot does not currently publish individual contributor profiles or name an expert reviewer. If a future article receives specialist review, that person and the scope of the review will be disclosed on the article.

Topic and source standards

Topics must help a reader understand an Unrot exercise, make a realistic practice decision, or place attention-related language in context. For scientific or health-adjacent claims, we prefer peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, consensus reports, and official public-health guidance. Search results, marketing pages, and unsourced summaries are not treated as final evidence.

Sources should support the sentence or section where they appear. We distinguish a measured task result from an inference about everyday life, and near transfer from broad far transfer. Articles avoid fabricated quotations, statistics without provenance, and claims of treatment, diagnosis, or guaranteed cognitive improvement.

Review before publication

  1. The topic and reader question are defined before drafting.
  2. Claims that can be checked are compared with the cited source, including dates, population, and study limits.
  3. Descriptions of Unrot games are checked against the current interface and recorded result.
  4. Links, headings, metadata, disclaimers, and related practice paths are reviewed before release.
  5. Medical-sounding promises, invented authority signals, and unsupported precision are removed.

Updates and correction records

Articles show publication and modified dates. The modified date changes when a revision materially affects the guidance, evidence, interpretation, or product description. Small spelling or formatting fixes may be made without changing that date. When a material factual error is corrected, the affected passage and its supporting source are rechecked; a correction note will be added when readers would otherwise be misled about the original claim.

To request a correction, email contact@unrot.net with the page URL, the statement in question, and a reliable supporting source. Product bugs and accessibility issues can use the same address. We review the evidence rather than accepting or rejecting a correction based only on who submitted it.

Commercial and privacy boundaries

Unrot currently carries no ads, affiliate links, paid rankings, or sponsored editorial placements. If that changes, commercial relationships will be labeled where a reader encounters them. Analytics and local progress storage are governed by the privacy policy; editorial claims are governed by the evidence limits described in the methodology.